Trans fat doesn't stir much 'nanny state' debate

WASHINGTON — They are among our most personal daily decisions: what to eat or drink. Maybe what to inhale.

Now that the government's banning trans fat, does that mean it's revving up to take away our choice to consume all sorts of other unhealthy stuff?

Salt? Soda? Cigarettes?

Nah.

In the tug-of-war between public health and personal freedom, the Food and Drug Administration's decision to ban trans fats barely rates a ripple.

Hardly anyone defends the icky-sounding artificial ingredient anymore. It was too decades when health activists began warning Americans that it was clogging their arteries and causing heart attacks.

Mostly, Americans' palates have moved on, and so have their arguments over what's sensible health policy and what amounts to a "nanny state" run amok.

Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang

Trans fat doesn't stir much 'nanny state' debate

Dengan url

http://tanganusaha.blogspot.com/2013/11/trans-fat-doesn-stir-much-state-debate.html

Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya

Trans fat doesn't stir much 'nanny state' debate

namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link

Trans fat doesn't stir much 'nanny state' debate

sebagai sumbernya